Based on the feedback I received on my previous post, some people believe that the existing local press doesn’t serve political and economical interests. On the contrary, local newspapers have been trying to point out the misconducts of the regional administrations and to support initiatives whose purpose is to alter these mistaken practices.
If that’s the case, then why, as I asked in the first part of this series, local newspapers are circulated mostly among public offices? Moreover, how many newspapers are actually circulated in our vicinity? To answer the last question I visited the website of the Union of Owners and Publishers of Attica’s Local Newspapers, where I discovered four newspapers that enjoy regional distribution. Except for one publication, I have never held in my hands any of the remaining three.
Even more interesting is the fact that in an e-mail I received, the sender counted more than four local and regional newspapers, while only very few have a noteworthy and sophisticated online presence. From my point of view this situation is ironically amusing. Considering that the established news business model is under momentous examination and doubt, shouldn’t the transition to an online venue be regarded as a viable option for a small news outlet?
Now that laid-off journalist in the other side of the Atlantic are getting involved with online local news initatives, shouldn’t we learn a few things and try to apply them according to our informational needs as members of our local communities and neighborhoods?
Could we, just for once, hop on a trend as it is unfolding? Don’t we all want to embrace change? Maybe yes; maybe not. It’s all part of our mindsets and mental capacities to welcome new ideas and practices.
To be continued in part 3…
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=d6fd4b53-0ff2-4809-987d-382e93b6eabd)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=11b1a52a-5193-4873-80bc-be55f9dcf4ff)
