Culture


20
Feb 10

Ζεστό, αληθινό αίμα: Μέρος 3ο [spoilers inside]

Πολλοί επισκέπτεστε το παρών blog αναζητώντας πληροφορίες για τα αγαπημένα βαμπιροδράματα της αμερικανικής τηλεόρασης. Για εσάς συγκέντρωσα σε αυτό το κείμενο μερικές από τις σημαντικότερες πληροφορίες που έχουν δημοσιευθεί στο διαδίκτυο για την τρίτη σεζόν του “True Blood”. Το ακόνισμα των κυνοδόντων κατά την ανάγνωση είναι προαιρετικό.

Όπως θα γνωρίζετε ήδη, στην τελευταία σκηνή της δεύτερης σεζόν ο Bill έπεσε θύμα απαγωγής και η Sookie έμεινε μόνη της στη σάλα ενός εκλεπτυσμένου εστιατορίου να φωνάζει το όνομα του. Με την τρίτη σεζόν να βασίζεται στο τρίτο βιβλίο της Charlaine Harris, Club Dead [το οποίο είναι διαθέσιμο στο Fnac και τον Παπασωτηρίου], η Sookie θα βρεθεί σε ρόλο Νικολούλη αναζητώντας τον έρωτα της ζωής της. Στο πλευρό της θα σταθεί ως φύλακας-λύκος ο Alcide Herveaux [o αντίστοιχος Jacob Black των The Southern Vampire Mysteries]. Στο ρόλο αυτόν του λυκάνθρωπου θα δούμε τον Owen από το One Tree Hill,  Joe Manganiello. Ελπίζω ο Alan Ball να έχει στρώσει το υποκριτικό ταλέντο του Joe μέχρι να τον δούμε στις οθόνες μας.

Η επόμενη είδηση αφορά την εμφάνιση του βασιλιά των βαμπίρ του Mississippi, ο οποίος βρίσκεται σε ανταγωνισμό με τη βασίλισσα Sophie-Anne της Louisiana και θα παίξει κεντρικό ρόλο στις ιστορίες που θα εκτυλιχθούν στην τρίτη σεζόν. Το ρόλο αυτόν θα υποδυθεί ο Dennis O’ Hare, ενώ στο ρόλο του Talbot, του βασιλικού συζύγου, θα βρεθεί ο έλληνας Theo Alexander, ο οποίος έχει εμφανιστεί στην ταινία “El Greco” και σε αρκετές αμερικανικές σειρές, όπως το Chuck, το Pushing Daisies και το CSI:NY.

Η τρίτη είδηση αφορά δύο ηθοποιούς που προέρχονται από την κωμική σειρά του ABC, “Ugly Betty”. Ο Kevin Alejandro και ο Grant Bowler ενσωματώνονται στο cast του True Blood, ο πρώτος ως βρικόλακας και ερωτικό ενδιαφέρον του Lafayette και ο δεύτερος ως λυκάνθρωπος. Παράλληλα, θα αρχίσουμε να μαθαίνουμε περισσότερα για τις οικογενειακές υποθέσεις μερικών από των αρχετυπικών χαρακτήρων της σειράς. Ο Sam Merlotte θα γνωρίσει, όπως όλα δείχνουν, τη βιολογική μητέρα και θα αρχίσει να λαμβάνει απαντήσεις για την καταγωγή του και τις υπερφυσικές ικανότητες του. Επίσης, σε αυτήν τη σεζόν, θα μάθουμε και την ιστορία του Eric. Όλα τα ερωτήματα που αφορούν στην καταγωγή του και τη ζωή του πριν γίνει βαμπίρ, επιτέλους, θα απαντηθούν.

Η τέταρτη και τελευταία είδηση έρχεται απευθείας από το γραφείο της ομάδας παραγωγής και αφορά το ενδυματολογικό τμήμα της σειράς, το οποίο κινδυνεύει να μείνει ανεκμετάλλευτο. Ο Alan Ball και οι συνεργάτες του έχουν αποφασίσει, σύμφωνα με τα σχετικά δημοσιεύματα, να κρατήσουν το cast όσο πιο γυμνό γίνεται. Επίσης, αξίζει να σημειωθεί ότι το HBO έχει ήδη δώσει το πράσινο φως για να συνεχιστεί το “True Blood’ και για τέταρτη σεζόν.

Εις το επανιδείν.

Spread the word:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • del.icio.us
  • Posterous
  • RSS
  • PDF
  • Reddit
  • FriendFeed

26
Oct 09

Mind the doll; she’s a mind-teaser

Echo (Dollhouse episode)
Image via Wikipedia

Most of us started watching Fox’s Dollhouse because of Whedon’s vampiric and mutant credentials. “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” is now an iconic pop culture idol and Whedon’s assignment in the X-Men Universe gave back Marvel’s lucrative outcasts their long-lost edginess.

Dollhouse, though, has proven to be a bag of mixed feelings and a recipient of lukewarm reviews and ratings. To be honest with you, I didn’t expect Fox to renew for a second season this dystopian, apocalyptic and ethically challenging sci-fi drama. Keeping in mind that Fox is the same network that hosts the most conservative/republican-oriented news programming, it’s rather surprising that the network chose to give to this progressive show another chance.

Surely there are moments of second-rate acting and poor plot, but Dollhouse’s concept provides the framework for a richer sociological and anthropological conversation like no other show on television right now. It raises issues of ethics, science and human nature in an unparalleled level for pop culture on a weekly basis. Sadly, though, Fox will eventually pull the plug on Dollhouse’s production after the show completes its 13-episode run. For what is worth, Dollhouse will surely have a better luck as an unappreciated cult show in the future and will set the stage for shows that provoke more than just our superficial senses.

Whedon’s creation is not an easy pill to swallow. It will neither comfort nor pamper you. Instead the knowledge that in the end nothing changes in the Dollhouse is the only redeeming element the viewer collects. Yet, Whedon is not a creature of habit. In this second season Whedon is shaking things up; thus progressing the storyline toward the cramped future depicted in the unaired 13th episode of the first season.

Though, most of all, Dollhouse is a show about how far men will go to satisfy their profound desires and the compromises they will have to endure to achieve them. In other words, it’s a trip to the dark side of the human nature and our innate lust for power and control.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Spread the word:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • del.icio.us
  • Posterous
  • RSS
  • PDF
  • Reddit
  • FriendFeed

21
Oct 09

Entering the Castle

DSC_4509

Image by Spec_J via Flickr

It’s been a while since my last dedicated post to television. Next to an immense course load and an alarmingly-demanding list of daily household chores, there seems to be no time left for extra entertainment. I even had to cut down on the shows I weekly follow. It was hard to say goodbye to half a dozen shows, but my schedule had started looking like a daily TV program schedule. My iCal had nothing to be jealous of TVGuide.

Today, though, I want to talk to you about a show that didn’t find its way to the “guillotine”. Today, it’s all about ABC’s Castle. With the show recently being picked up for a full second season, Firefly’s Nathan Fillion will continue his effortless performance as the best-selling, prolific and curious writer Richard Castle who never stops giving grief to his muse, the ingenious yet stunning Detective Kate Beckett (played by Stana Katic).

Castle, after killing off his starring hero in the lucrative book series that made him famous and wealthy, helped in the investigation of an unsolved crime. His collaboration with Detective Beckett inspired him with the creation of a crime-related book series, based on Beckett’s character and their adventures. Even if Castle started as mid-season filler show last season, it returned with a vengeance, since viewers couldn’t get enough of Castle’s wits and comedic relief. Every case is another brain-teaser and the chemistry between Fillion and Katic has become a strong element of the show, because it allows them to develop their characters.

Definitely Castle is the star of the show, but Beckett has some noteworthy moments of brilliance, I might say. Thankfully the writing team has kept the sexual tension up to a minimum, leaving the two leads with the necessary time and space to progress their respective storylines as individuals. Castle, besides his social stature and sometimes decadent lifestyle, already has a daughter from a previous marriage and Detective Beckett…well I will leave that to you to find out.

For someone who’s not into police dramas, he/she could easily enjoy this show, because of its two-point angle, the writer’s and the detective’s, which is adding up another layer in the endless scuffle between fiction and reality. Moreover, don’t you want to know how mystery and crime novels are researched and writer? I know I do.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Spread the word:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • del.icio.us
  • Posterous
  • RSS
  • PDF
  • Reddit
  • FriendFeed

20
Oct 09

Victims of hoaxes

Publicity stunt in Salt Lake City,1910: "...
Image via Wikipedia

How many times have we been victimized by publicity stunts and media hoaxes? Have you ever wondered how easily it is to get “under the spell” of a fascinating story whose sole purpose is to raise eyebrows according to a marketing plan?

The reason I’m asking these questions is the recent #balloonboy incident that made it through the headlines of every major American news organization and the travesty of a particular Greek news morning show. Should we just examine the ethos of those who created these disturbances? Don’t we have our own share of responsibility as the audience?

In the current media landscape, we certainly enjoy the notion that we are the crowd formerly known as the audience. We create and share valuable content. We set trends. We contribute to social causes and lobby for policies. We elevate values and shatter reputations. We consume products and services and post online our reviews. Businesses and administrations pamper us by taking into account our opinions and implementing some of our suggestions. We mobilize people in favor of social justice, equality and human rights. We inspire the future adults. We provide accurate and constant updates on current affairs. And, of course, we take pleasure in all the attention we get.

We have changed the game, yet sometimes when it comes to the next big trending topic, our judgment is clouded. We hurry to re-produce the latest news without researching, while we retain our scrutiny regarding legitimate online –short lived- campaigns [ex. #beatcancer]. We are supposed to be media-savvy and quick fact-checkers.  Thus, why hoaxes still surprise us? Are we still immature or scammers have simply outpaced us?

Maybe we still haven’t discovered an efficient way to control our daily information overload. No matter how many tools we as users have in our disposal to select the information that suits our needs and interests, we continue to be prone in excessive media consumption; therefore we scratch only the surface of the information we receive and remain indifferent for its source and intentions.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Spread the word:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • del.icio.us
  • Posterous
  • RSS
  • PDF
  • Reddit
  • FriendFeed

20
Oct 09

Free Higher Education

A fire truck was placed on the Great Dome by s...
Image via Wikipedia

In this economy, people around the world are asking fretfully what it takes to stay relevant in the current globalized job market. Is it skills? Is it knowledge or just a load of degrees? Honestly, there is not a single universal answer. There is, though, one thing we could write down and take into daily account: never stop self-improving.

Now, more than ever, it’ s easier to learn new things, harness and hone our talents and skills, and employ new tools and techniques. By adopting the innate values of openness, accessibility and transparency of the Internet, leading foreign universities and colleges have started sharing their accumulated knowledge through an expanding list of online venues. Lectures, seminars, class notes, assignments and up-to-date research papers in every scientific field can be easily accessed by visiting either popular social networking hangouts or explicit files hosting websites [Scribd, Esnips].

Still the number one destination in the aforementioned list is iTunesU, the free academic counterpart of the succesful iTunes store. By congregating academic content from a growing directory of participating scholarly institutions , iTunesU has turned into a gigantic online campus filled with videos and podcasts from lectures, seminars and supplementary academic material on almost every science and art known to man.

In the meantime the OpenCourseWare Consortium has gathered a noteworthy roster of universities as members and contributors to its goal: «to provide high quality education materials, organized as courses». Almost every country is represented in the Consortium, but don’ t expect to see any Greek university in this catalog. Greek higher learning institutions are still struggling to grasp the merits of the distance-learning programs ; we have a long road ahead of us, until educational administrative policies start fostering the attributes of online shared knowledge [even if there are high hopes with the new administration].

On the same foundation of this trend, seven prestigious American universities have assisted in the creation of AcademicEarth. Yale, Princeton, Harvard, Berkeley, UCLA, MIT and Stanford are now sharing videos straight from the classroom on issues involving law, literature, mathematics, political science, history, entrepreneurship and many more. It’s actually surprising that this breadth and depth of knowledge is just a few clicks away. In the same spirit, FORA.tv provides one of the largest video libraries of live events, seminars, conferences, discussions , etc. The list of content providers includes think tanks, universities, foundations, councils, research centers and exclusive policy clubs.

Some people might think that there has to be an ulterior motive behind this openness. Maybe it’s another publicity stunt to attract more students or a governmental activity in the context of a country’s public diplomacy. But could there be a slight chance that there is nothing suspicious in these initiatives? Are we walking into an era when knowledge is free and easily accessible? Could this actually help social cohesion and equality policies? One can only hope.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Spread the word:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • del.icio.us
  • Posterous
  • RSS
  • PDF
  • Reddit
  • FriendFeed